Migrate from cursor to trae.
1 documentation-derived translation pattern — what carries over and what to watch for. Cited to the Feature Parity Map; the audit tells you whether the move is worth it.
Both are in-IDE autonomous agents that plan a task from a natural-language prompt, edit multiple files, run commands, and call MCP tools. Moving a TRAE SOLO workflow into Cursor: open the Agents Window / Composer (Cmd/Ctrl+I) and toggle Agent mode (Shift+Tab); TRAE's Plan mode maps to Cursor's Ask/Plan-style review-before-act, and TRAE's Spec-mode requirements/design/tasks documents map to Cursor project rules in .cursor/rules/*.mdc plus a checked-in plan file. Re-point any MCP servers you configured for SOLO Agent into Cursor's MCP settings, and pick an equivalent frontier model in Cursor's model picker (TRAE and Cursor both expose Claude/GPT/Gemini families). TRAE's per-agent prompt + toolset for custom callable agents becomes scoped Cursor agent configs (per-agent rules in .cursor/rules plus dedicated background/parallel-agent runs).
- Warning: TRAE's SOLO Agent orchestrates custom sub-agents in isolated contexts; Cursor's parallel multi-agent runs (up to 8 via git worktrees) pick a best result rather than composing specialized sub-agents.
- Warning: Cursor's billing is a per-plan credit pool (Auto mode unlimited, frontier models debit credits); TRAE meters fast/premium requests with purchasable add-on packs — cost shape differs, so re-estimate per-task spend.
- Warning: Spec-mode artifacts (requirements/design/tasks files at the project root) are a TRAE convention; Cursor has no identical document scaffold, so you reproduce them as plain repo files or rules.
- Warning: TRAE built-in models exclude GPT/Gemini-3.x/MiniMax for US users; Cursor's frontier-model lineup for US users differs, so the exact model you relied on may not be a like-for-like swap.