Migrate from grammarly to wordtune.
1 documentation-derived translation pattern — what carries over and what to watch for. Cited to the Feature Parity Map; the audit tells you whether the move is worth it.
Both tools deliver inline rewrites as a browser-extension overlay across the web plus Google Docs and Microsoft Word, so the muscle memory transfers: highlight text, then accept a suggested rewrite. To consolidate from Wordtune into Grammarly, install the Grammarly browser extension (and the Word/Google Docs add-in) for each writer, then map workflows: Wordtune's plain Rewrite maps to Grammarly's clarity & conciseness suggestions and full-sentence/paragraph rewrites; Wordtune's Make it Casual / Make it Formal maps to Grammarly's tone adjustment (node:grammarly/tone-detection-adjustment). Confirm seats are on Grammarly Pro or higher before cutover, because full-sentence and full-paragraph rewrites are gated above Free.
- Warning: Wordtune gives a list of alternative phrasings to pick from on demand; Grammarly leans toward surfacing one suggested rewrite inline as a correction, so writers lose the menu-of-options feel.
- Warning: Wordtune's Shorten/Expand length controls and on-demand synonym (thesaurus) lookup are not a one-to-one feature in Grammarly's clarity rewrites; budget for a behavior change, not just a tool swap.
- Warning: Grammarly's full-sentence and full-paragraph rewrites require Pro or higher, so a team moving off Wordtune's paid tiers should not assume Grammarly Free covers the same rewriting depth.